Facing a possible retrial, a South Carolina man chose to accept a $1.6 million from Merck & Co. after a trial judge overturned the original $51 million verdict. The plaintiff alleged that Vioxx was to blame for a heart attack he suffered in 2002. The judge found the original award to be excessive in light of the plaintiff’s successful recovery and a general lack of economic damages resulting from the heart attack.
Source: "Vioxx Plaintiff Takes $1.6M Rather Than Retry on Damages" published in the New Orleans Times-Picayune.




Hi, Found a cool news widget for our blogs at www.widgetmate.com. Now I can show the latest news on my blog. Worked like a breeze.
Posted by: Mark Vane | June 26, 2007 at 04:48 AM